Main Posts

Book Discussion: The Square and the Tower

Book Discussion: The Square and the Tower

07/18/2024

newmag-y-n

The Institute of Public Policy has initiated book discussions with the support of The Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

The Institute of Public Policy has hosted a series of discussions focusing on recent Armenian publications/translations. The initiative aims to introduce significant fiction and non-fiction books to a broad audience of readers.

The most recent discussion centered around Niall Ferguson's book "The Square and the Tower." Avetik Mejlumyan, the IPP’s director, and Davit Sargsyan, the book's translator, delved into its key features, modern historiographical approaches, and global trends.

According to Avetik Mejlumyan, the book explores the interaction between networks and hierarchies throughout history, highlighting periods when one prevailed over the other.

"Networks have played a crucial role in two historical eras. The first 'network age' began in 15th-century Europe with the invention of the printing press and continued until the late 18th century. The second era began in the 1970s and continues today."

Participants expressed interest in the book's methodological aspects, questioning the author's insights, the creative process, and the dynamics between networks and hierarchies.

"If you think that social media is a modern phenomenon, this book will challenge that notion," remarked the translator. "It reveals that such networks have always existed and exerted significant influence. Historians traditionally focused on states, kings, wars, and victories, but Ferguson's work shifts our perspective."

Network theory is reshaping our understanding of the past and present, predicting which hierarchies will withstand the latest wave of network challenges and which will falter.


Share

The Square and the Tower
The Square and the Tower

Niall Ferguson

8800 ֏

Description

Most history is hierarchical: it's about emperors, presidents, prime ministers and field marshals. It's about states, armies and corporations. It's about orders from on high. Even history "from below" is often about trade unions and workers' parties. But what if that's simply because hierarchical institutions create the archives that historians rely on? What if we are missing the informal, less well documented social networks that are the true sources of power and drivers of change?The 21st cent...